RFC2606 ignorant's favourites


RFC2606 states: Confusion and conflict can be caused by the use of a current or future top level domain name in experimentation or testing, as an example in documentation, to indicate invalid names, or as a synonym for the loop back address. Test and experimental software can escape and end up being run against the global operational DNS. Even examples used "only" in documentation can end up being coded and released or cause conflicts due to later real use and the possible acquisition of intellectual property rights in such "example" names.

Favourite usernames hit list of RFC2606 ignorants at noone.org

This is currently always the statistic for the last four weeks. No username in this list is valid. (Last update: Thursday, 22-Mar-2018 13:23:02 CET)

    115 noone
     47 noreply
     41 none1
     37 no...
     35 123456
     32 danielle
     32 blosxom
     28 edns
     17 verio
     14 nobody
     14 billyhart
     13 no
     12 aldenmarquez
     11 trust
     10 justme
      7 smuch
      7 none
      7 jojpojpojpoj
      5 harriscooper
      4 yourfriend
      3 dnedendenden
      3 colinpham
      2 youfrien
      2 whocares
      2 nunurbusdiness
      2 notr3alwh0c4res
      2 janedoe


Only use domain names specified in RFC2606 as default values or examples for URLs, e-mail addresses or any other value including hostnames. Do not use domains like noone.org, somewhere.com, donotreply.com, etc. The postmasters and webmasters of those domains will be thankful. (Greetings to Kee Hinckley and Chet Faliszek! ;-)

Copyright © 2007 by Axel Beckert (abe@noone.org)
Last static modification: 07-Jan-16, 16:56 (CET)