Wednesday·12·November·2008
e-mail.is-not-s.ms //at 20:35 //by abe
When I first read http://two.sentenc.es/ in (if I remember correctly) madduck’s signature, I thought something like “This can’t be! Why are people castrating themself?”
Although I really understand that the inventor has good reasons for such a personal policy, I notice how much time I waste by trying to fit all the information I want to transmit in the 160 characters a short messages allows — or, even worse, into the 140 characters microblogging services like identi.ca or Twitter allow.
So I had to oppose something to this, but even to only reach the coolness level of the domain “sentenc.es” is hard, you probably can’t top it at all. For luck, I’m not alone and Venty had the right idea for a hostname which has at least some geeky niveau.
So here it is, our pleading for e-mails as long and detailed as necessary:
A German version will be available soon at http://e-mail.ist-nicht-s.ms/.
Feel free to add either URL to your e-mail signature. :-)
Oh, and thanks to the Government of Montserrat which allows strangers to register .ms domains without any hassles. :-)
Update / FAQ
Seems to be necessary to make a few things clear…
- No, I do not think that everyone using two.sentenc.es has neither style nor knows anything about grammar or punctuation. What I say is that the site two.sentenc.es itself with its comparision to short messages (and especially without reading the author’s blog post about the site’s background) indirectly suggests to drop grammar, punctuation and style by cramming all information into a limit number of characters as often done with short messages or microblogging. And the limitation in senctences leads to tapeworm sentences which I try to avoid since they’re considered bad style, too.
- And yes, it’s consciously written and designed to be the opposite
of two.sentenc.es — even the colors
and the font— and therefore is of course very close to the original. See it as it parody or satire if the closeness makes you angry. - And no, I currently don’t care if the site makes less sense if you don’t know two.sentenc.es — people usually can follow hyperlinks on websites.
- We weren’t the first ones who noticed that e-mail is not SMS. An example of the problem described above from 2001.
Tagged as: domain, e-mail, embperl, grammar, identi.ca, is-not-sms, language, madduck, microblogging, montserrat, Other Blogs, parody, personal policy, philosophy, rant, satire, SMS, style, ventilator, WTF
6 comments // write a comment // comments off
Related stories
Comments
Re: e-mail.is-not-s.ms
Posted by: martin krafft Website: http://madduck.net Time: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:19 Adoptiong two.sentenc.es as a policy has nothing to do with decrease in style or quality of language, grammar, punctuation or anything of that sort. I subscribe to two.sentenc.es because I very rarely need more than two sentences to say what I need to say.
Re: e-mail.is-not-s.ms
Posted by: foo Website: mailto:foo@bar.com Time: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 02:16 u r teh awsum
Re: e-mail.is-not-s.ms
Posted by: Dieter Schlabonski Website: http://www.schlabonski.de/ Time: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:50 I have one objection to make: With this project, you're singling out SMS as the one means of communication where it's somehow okay to abbreviate, mangle and mistype the hell out of everything. I beg to differ: my SMS messages (or are they "SMs"?) are written just as carefully as my e-mail or IRC messages. And I happen to know that yours are, too. :-)
Fontana Junk Removal
Posted by: Ryan Leonard Website: mailto:ryanleonard092660@gmail.com Time: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:26 It is important to know that the content must powerful.
Ryan | Arborist
Re: e-mail.is-not-s.ms
Posted by: Madison W. Website: Time: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 07:39 It seems it can only be sensibly referenced in a setting where two.sentenc.es is well-known, which (almost) never will happen. Tile Company
Your Comment
Spam Protection: To post a comment, you'll have to answer the following question: What is 42 minus 19?
Re: e-mail.is-not-s.ms
hey Your answer/alternative is not really constructive and seems to be posted more as an act against two.sentenc.es than being a contribution of its own. It seems it can only be sensibly referenced in a setting where two.sentenc.es is well-known, which (almost) never will happen.
Yeah so you have a point, and for different people different rules make sense, but my tip is to write it as a standalone contribution if you're serious.
Reply